The person on the left is recognizable as Sarah Jessica Parker, however, the person on the right is not her younger brother, but in fact HER before her sex change in 1982.
Ha, ha. Just kidding. It's Mitch from Real Genius. But if ever someone had a doppelganger...
I am so sick of the bullshit hype around Sex and the City 2, that I could puke blood. Under no circumstance is it acceptable to go see this movie. Only if your dying grandma makes it her last request while holding a puppy with sunglasses in one hand, and a kitten with a bandaged leg in the other.
xoxo.
7 comments:
I read this review:
I think I Watched 146 Minutes of Sex and the City 2 and All I Got Was This Religious Fundamentalism
http://www.thestranger.com/seattle/burkas-and-birkins/Content?oid=4132715
She seemed to agree with you that it's not as deep and philosophical as, say, Avatar or The Hangover.
Respectfully, Étienne
I read that 90% of the audience for Sex and the City 2 were WOMEN! So men don't create all the horrible evil things in the world!
greg!
But a man DID create it, as it was written by one! Ha!
xoxo.
Etienne,
Roger Ebert's review is scathing, absolutely fierce. I love how much shade critics are throwing at it. Hilarious.
touche Miss!!!
The Real Genius dude looks like he is wearing eye shadow and lipstick.
Is that a photoshop joke or just the makeup people for the show having gone a bit overboard.
I don't know what it is, but that is easier to pick out these days for some reason.
About ten years ago I borrowed a SATC dvd from a friend, enjoyed it and never watched it again. It seems like they are trying to resurrect it past its prime.
Soapy
Soapy,
That picture of Mitch is straight from the movie, and the one of SJP I think was taken around the same time period. So... probably some small time after Valley Girl or something. I don't think either picture has been doctored. The resemblance is really striking, so I don't think there would be much need.
xoxo.
Post a Comment